APPAppLovin
Is the price fair?
Neither cheap nor expensive: nothing decisive, though cheap against its own history.
Cheap vs its own history: P/E 21.3 vs a 44.7 median over 12 quarters (−52% vs median).
Sector median 30.5× across 203 covered peers. EV/EBIT counts debt as part of the price, so a cash-rich and a borrowed company can be compared on the same footing.
Against the whole market›
Percentile against every name Ryufin tracks. Higher is better; the tick marks the middle of the market. Context, not one of the checks above.
Where this answer is blind. The growth-implied estimate assumes a fixed discount rate; capital-heavy sectors look structurally rich on it.
What APP's price assumes
AppLovin trades at 21.3× earnings against 21.3× for the median Advertising Agencies name, cheaper than its own group.
Trailing P/E · Advertising Agencies median 21.3 · cheaper than the typical name in its group
- Price / sales
- 23.1
Price / sales · today's price, trailing year to Jun 30, 2026
- Price / book
- 49.9
Price / book · today's price, trailing year to Jun 30, 2026
- EV / sales
- 23.2
EV / sales
Details›
- Price / booktoday's price, trailing year to Jun 30, 2026
- 49.9
- EV / EBITtoday's price, trailing year to Jun 30, 2026
- 29.9
- EV / salestoday's price, trailing year to Jun 30, 2026
- 23.2
- Technology median P/E459 names
- 37.7
- Advertising Agencies median P/E15 names
- 21.3
- Market capitalisation
- $157.8B
| Method | Per share |
|---|---|
| What its own history would imply | not meaningful, 21.3× today against a 44.7× median |
| 52-week range | $267.97 – $733.60 |
| Today | $277.21 |
Multiples from SEC filings and end-of-day closes; implied growth from a reverse discounted cash flow. Group medians across the names Ryufin tracks.
Advertising Agencies
The closest names by size in the same industry