RDNTRadNet, Inc.

$70.89-7.3% 1Y

Is it safe?

Good

Strong, no red flags: a safe balance sheet.

1 good, 2 neutral, 3 without data
SurvivalSafe zoneSEC EDGAR · Dec 31, 2025

Financially healthy, low distress risk Altman Z-score, a bankruptcy-risk model from five balance-sheet ratios.

Credit gradeBBBderived · Jun 30, 2026

Investment-grade balance sheet. A rule of thumb on leverage, not a credit rating.

Drawdown risk45% volderived · Oct 9, 2026

Moderate price swings, typical volatility. Worst drawdown -73% · now 16% below its 52-week high.

Against the whole market›

Percentile against every name Ryufin tracks. Higher is better; the tick marks the middle of the market. Context, not one of the checks above.

Volatilitymiddle of the market
Max drawdownmiddle of the market

Where this answer is blind. Altman sits structurally low for utilities and pipelines; Beneish runs high for fast growers, since sales growth alone lifts it; banks and REITs are excluded.

Can RDNT take a bad year?

RadNet, Inc. carries $637M of net debt at 2.63× EBITDA: a load its earnings can carry.

$637M

Net debt · as at Q2 2026 · between two and four years of EBITDA, normal for a stable business

Net debt / EBITDA
2.63×

Net debt / EBITDA · 1.42× a year ago · the load is going up

Altman Z-score
1.88

Altman Z-score · grey zone, between 1.8 and 3

Interest cover
0.99×

Interest cover · operating profit does not cover the interest bill

Details›
Total debtQ2 2026
$1.36B
Cash and short-term investments
$726M
Net debt
$637M
EBITDA, trailing twelve months
$242M
Operating profit, trailing twelve months
$71M
Debt / equity
1.24×
Total debt / EBITDA
5.63×
Annualised volatilitytwo years of daily moves
45%
Worst drawdown on file
−73%
Below its 52-week high
16%

Balance sheet from SEC filings; drawdown and volatility from end-of-day closes; Altman Z from the filed statements.