CHRNChronoScale Corporation
Is it safe?
Mixed picture: a safe balance sheet and clean books, but quality weak and heavy debt (BB).
Financially healthy, low distress risk Altman Z-score, a bankruptcy-risk model from five balance-sheet ratios.
Reported earnings show no manipulation flags Beneish M-score, a forensic model that detects earnings-manipulation patterns (receivables outrunning sales, margins slipping, accrual-heavy profit).
Weak, deteriorating fundamentals Piotroski F-score, nine pass/fail tests of year-over-year financial health across profitability, balance sheet and efficiency. 7 to 9 is strong, 0 to 3 weak.
Net cash, but unprofitable, speculative. A rule of thumb on leverage, not a credit rating.
Large price swings, high volatility. Worst drawdown -100% · now 38% below its 52-week high.
Unless marked, from SEC EDGAR, as of May 31, 2026.
Against the whole market›
Percentile against every name Ryufin tracks. Higher is better; the tick marks the middle of the market. Context, not one of the checks above.
Where this answer is blind. Altman sits structurally low for utilities and pipelines; Beneish runs high for fast growers, since sales growth alone lifts it; banks and REITs are excluded.
Can CHRN take a bad year?
ChronoScale Corporation holds $2.7M more cash than debt, and is burning $3.0M a quarter, about 0.3 years of cover.
Net cash
- Net debt / EBITDA
- net cash
Net debt / EBITDA · no net borrowings to measure against earnings
- Altman Z-score
- 12.08
Altman Z-score · safe zone, above 3
- Cash runway
- 0.3 years
Cash runway · burning $3.0M a quarter at the current rate
Details›
- Total debtQ3 2026
- $1.3M
- Cash and short-term investments
- $4.0M
- Net cash
- $2.7M
- EBITDA, trailing twelve months
- −$14M
- Operating profit, trailing twelve months
- −$16M
- Debt / equity
- 0.60×
- Annualised volatilitytwo years of daily moves
- 120%
- Worst drawdown on file
- −100%
- Below its 52-week high
- 38%
Balance sheet from SEC filings; drawdown and volatility from end-of-day closes; Altman Z from the filed statements.
Information Technology Services
Ranks #29 of 31 by RyuScore