PLDPrologis
Is it safe?
Nothing alarming, nothing pristine: insiders quiet, comfortable debt (A), and typical volatility.
Insiders were net sellers (-$7.5M, 90 days to Oct 8, 2026), selling is often routine.
Investment-grade balance sheet. A rule of thumb on leverage, not a credit rating.
Moderate price swings, typical volatility. Worst drawdown -43% · now 14% below its 52-week high.
Against the whole market›
Percentile against every name Ryufin tracks. Higher is better; the tick marks the middle of the market. Context, not one of the checks above.
Where this answer is blind. Altman sits structurally low for utilities and pipelines; Beneish runs high for fast growers, since sales growth alone lifts it; banks and REITs are excluded.
Can PLD take a bad year?
Prologis carries $33.8B of net debt at 4.57× EBITDA: a heavy load to carry through a bad year.
Net debt · as at Q1 2026 · over four years of earnings before interest, tax and depreciation, heavy
- Net debt / EBITDA
- 4.57×
Net debt / EBITDA · 4.41× a year ago · the load is going up
- Debt / equity
- 0.65×
Debt / equity
- Annualised volatility
- 26%
Annualised volatility · about as steady as the market itself
Details›
- Total debtQ1 2026
- $34.7B
- Cash and short-term investments
- $861M
- Net debt
- $33.8B
- EBITDA, trailing twelve months
- $7.40B
- Operating profit, trailing twelve months
- $4.69B
- Debt / equity
- 0.65×
- Total debt / EBITDA
- 4.69×
- Annualised volatilitytwo years of daily moves
- 26%
- Worst drawdown on file
- −43%
- Below its 52-week high
- 14%
Balance sheet from SEC filings; drawdown and volatility from end-of-day closes; Altman Z from the filed statements.
REIT, Industrial
The closest names by size in the same industry