LULULululemon Athletica
Is it safe?
Solid, nothing alarming: a safe balance sheet and comfortable debt (AA), but big price swings.
Financially healthy, low distress risk Altman Z-score, a bankruptcy-risk model from five balance-sheet ratios.
Some accounting flags, worth a closer look Beneish M-score, a forensic model that detects earnings-manipulation patterns (receivables outrunning sales, margins slipping, accrual-heavy profit).
Mixed fundamental signals Piotroski F-score, nine pass/fail tests of year-over-year financial health across profitability, balance sheet and efficiency. 7 to 9 is strong, 0 to 3 weak.
Net cash and profitable. A rule of thumb on leverage, not a credit rating.
Large price swings, high volatility. Worst drawdown -82% · now 56% below its 52-week high.
Unless marked, from SEC EDGAR, as of Feb 1, 2026.
Against the whole market›
Percentile against every name Ryufin tracks. Higher is better; the tick marks the middle of the market. Context, not one of the checks above.
Where this answer is blind. Altman sits structurally low for utilities and pipelines; Beneish runs high for fast growers, since sales growth alone lifts it; banks and REITs are excluded.
Can LULU take a bad year?
Lululemon Athletica holds $1.39B more cash than debt, so a bad year is a question about profits, not about lenders.
Net cash
- Net debt / EBITDA
- net cash
Net debt / EBITDA · no net borrowings to measure against earnings
- Altman Z-score
- 5.42
Altman Z-score · safe zone, above 3
- Debt / equity
- 0.00×
Debt / equity
Details›
- Total debtQ2 2026
- $0
- Cash and short-term investments
- $1.39B
- Net cash
- $1.39B
- EBITDA, trailing twelve months
- $2.52B
- Operating profit, trailing twelve months
- $1.98B
- Debt / equity
- 0.00×
- Total debt / EBITDA
- 0.00×
- Annualised volatilitytwo years of daily moves
- 48%
- Worst drawdown on file
- −82%
- Below its 52-week high
- 56%
Balance sheet from SEC filings; drawdown and volatility from end-of-day closes; Altman Z from the filed statements.
Apparel Retail
The closest names by size in the same industry