EPAMEPAM Systems
Is it safe?
Solid, nothing alarming: comfortable debt (AA), but big price swings.
Mixed fundamental signals Piotroski F-score, nine pass/fail tests of year-over-year financial health across profitability, balance sheet and efficiency. 7 to 9 is strong, 0 to 3 weak.
Net cash and profitable. A rule of thumb on leverage, not a credit rating.
Large price swings, high volatility. Worst drawdown -89% · now 49% below its 52-week high.
Against the whole market›
Percentile against every name Ryufin tracks. Higher is better; the tick marks the middle of the market. Context, not one of the checks above.
Where this answer is blind. Altman sits structurally low for utilities and pipelines; Beneish runs high for fast growers, since sales growth alone lifts it; banks and REITs are excluded.
Can EPAM take a bad year?
EPAM Systems holds $764M more cash than debt, so a bad year is a question about profits, not about lenders.
Net cash
- Net debt / EBITDA
- net cash
Net debt / EBITDA · no net borrowings to measure against earnings
- Debt / equity
- 0.01×
Debt / equity
- Annualised volatility
- 47%
Annualised volatility · roughly twice as jumpy as the market
Details›
- Total debtQ2 2026
- $25M
- Cash and short-term investments
- $789M
- Net cash
- $764M
- EBITDA, trailing twelve months
- $689M
- Operating profit, trailing twelve months
- $563M
- Debt / equity
- 0.01×
- Total debt / EBITDA
- 0.04×
- Annualised volatilitytwo years of daily moves
- 47%
- Worst drawdown on file
- −89%
- Below its 52-week high
- 49%
Balance sheet from SEC filings; drawdown and volatility from end-of-day closes; Altman Z from the filed statements.
Information Technology Services
The closest names by size in the same industry