CEVACEVA, Inc.
Is it safe?
Mixed picture: clean books, but quality weak and heavy debt (CCC).
Reported earnings show no manipulation flags Beneish M-score, a forensic model that detects earnings-manipulation patterns (receivables outrunning sales, margins slipping, accrual-heavy profit).
Weak, deteriorating fundamentals Piotroski F-score, nine pass/fail tests of year-over-year financial health across profitability, balance sheet and efficiency. 7 to 9 is strong, 0 to 3 weak.
Debt against weak or negative operating profit. A rule of thumb on leverage, not a credit rating.
Large price swings, high volatility. Worst drawdown -78% · now 33% below its 52-week high.
Unless marked, from SEC EDGAR, as of Dec 31, 2025.
Against the whole market›
Percentile against every name Ryufin tracks. Higher is better; the tick marks the middle of the market. Context, not one of the checks above.
Where this answer is blind. Altman sits structurally low for utilities and pipelines; Beneish runs high for fast growers, since sales growth alone lifts it; banks and REITs are excluded.
Can CEVA take a bad year?
The deepest fall in CEVA's price history on file is −78%; it is 33% below its high today.
Worst drawdown on file · −33% today
- Cash runway
- 5+ years
Cash runway · burning $266K a quarter at the current rate
- Annualised volatility
- 67%
Annualised volatility · three times the market's own swing
Details›
- Cash and short-term investments
- $216M
- EBITDA, trailing twelve months
- −$7.8M
- Operating profit, trailing twelve months
- −$9.6M
- Annualised volatilitytwo years of daily moves
- 67%
- Worst drawdown on file
- −78%
- Below its 52-week high
- 33%
Balance sheet from SEC filings; drawdown and volatility from end-of-day closes; Altman Z from the filed statements.