BLMNBloomin' Brands, Inc.
Is the price fair?
Neither cheap nor expensive: modest expectations priced in, but at the top of its own P/E range.
Priced for a decline (~−15% a year). The price bakes in little to no growth.
Expensive vs its own history: P/E 26.5 vs a 17.2 median over 34 quarters (+54% vs median).
Where this answer is blind. The growth-implied estimate assumes a fixed discount rate; capital-heavy sectors look structurally rich on it.
What BLMN's price assumes
Bloomin' Brands, Inc. trades at 26.5× earnings against 28.5× for the median Restaurants name, cheaper than its own group.
Trailing P/E · Restaurants median 28.5 · cheaper than the typical name in its group
- Price / sales
- 0.12
Price / sales · as of 2026-Q1
- Free cash flow yield
- 21%
Free cash flow yield · Restaurants median 4.3%
- Growth the price implies
- −15%
Growth the price implies · The price pays for −15% free cash flow growth a year for a decade; the business has delivered −8.4% a year over the last three.
Details›
- Price / bookas of 2026-Q1
- 1.17
- EV / EBIToperating margin 1.2%: the multiple describes the denominator
- not meaningful
- EV / salesas of 2026-Q1
- 0.60
- Consumer Cyclical median P/E321 names
- 17.9
- Restaurants median P/E30 names
- 28.5
- Free cash flow, trailing twelve months
- $155M
- Market capitalisation
- $726M
- 3-year revenue growth
- +0.69%
- 3-year free cash flow growth
- −8.4%
| Method | Per share |
|---|---|
| Its own P/E history, lower quartile | $4.05 |
| Its own P/E history, median | $5.50 |
| Its own P/E history, upper quartile | $7.02 |
| 52-week range | $5.26 – $11.85 |
| Today | $8.48 |
Multiples from SEC filings and end-of-day closes; implied growth from a reverse discounted cash flow. Group medians across the names Ryufin tracks.