QLDvsQYLD

ProShares Ultra QQQ ETF or Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 61% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 92 stocks in both. Over the last twelve months QLD returned +88.2% and QYLD +19.5%.

61%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
QLD61% in stocks the other holds too
QYLD97% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

QLDQYLDYearly costn/a0.60%Net assets$14.5B$8.1BPositions127104Last 12 months+88.2%+19.5%3 years, a year+51.2%+12.3%5 years, a year+25.6%+7.8%Largest holdingN/A 24.1%NVDA 8.2%Main sectorTechnology 36%Technology 57%Holdings as ofMay 31, 2026Jul 31, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from September 2019, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

QLD$833QYLD$165
September 2019May 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (QLD: May 2026, QYLD: July 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.