ONEQvsQYLD

Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF or Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 71% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 97 stocks in both. ONEQ costs 0.21% a year against 0.60% for QYLD, $39 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months ONEQ returned +42.0% and QYLD +19.5%.

71%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
ONEQ84% in stocks the other holds too
QYLD98% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

ONEQQYLDYearly cost0.21%0.60%Net assets$10.9B$8.1BPositions1,025104Last 12 months+42.0%+19.5%3 years, a year+28.7%+12.3%5 years, a year+15.5%+7.8%Largest holdingNVDA 11.2%NVDA 8.2%Main sectorTechnology 53%Technology 57%Holdings as ofMay 31, 2026Jul 31, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from September 2019, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

ONEQ$360QYLD$165
September 2019May 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (ONEQ: May 2026, QYLD: July 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.