QQQIvsQYLD

NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF or Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 91% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 97 stocks in both. QYLD costs 0.60% a year against 0.68% for QQQI, $8 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months QQQI returned +26.0% and QYLD +19.5%.

91%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
QQQI98% in stocks the other holds too
QYLD98% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

QQQIQYLDYearly cost0.68%0.60%Net assets$13.1B$8.1BPositions105104Last 12 months+26.0%+19.5%3 years, a yearn/a+12.3%5 years, a yearn/a+7.8%Largest holdingNVDA 7.7%NVDA 8.2%Main sectorTechnology 59%Technology 57%Holdings as ofJun 30, 2026Jul 31, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from January 2024, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

QQQI$161QYLD$140
January 2024June 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (QQQI: June 2026, QYLD: July 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.