ONEQvsQQQM

Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF or Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 70% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 97 stocks in both. QQQM costs 0.15% a year against 0.21% for ONEQ, $6 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months ONEQ returned +42.0% and QQQM +42.9%.

70%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
ONEQ84% in stocks the other holds too
QQQM98% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

ONEQQQQMYearly cost0.21%0.15%Net assets$10.9B$97.2BPositions1,025105Last 12 months+42.0%+42.9%3 years, a year+28.7%+29.4%5 years, a year+15.5%+18.0%Largest holdingNVDA 11.2%NVDA 8.1%Main sectorTechnology 53%Technology 57%Holdings as ofMay 31, 2026May 31, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from October 2020, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

ONEQ$254QQQM$260
October 2020May 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (ONEQ: May 2026, QQQM: May 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.