ONEQvsVUG

Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF or Vanguard Growth ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 70% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 78 stocks in both. VUG costs 0.03% a year against 0.21% for ONEQ, $18 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months ONEQ returned +42.0% and VUG +18.6%.

70%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
ONEQ73% in stocks the other holds too
VUG81% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

ONEQVUGYearly cost0.21%0.03%Net assets$10.9B$379.3BPositions1,025152Last 12 months+42.0%+18.6%3 years, a year+28.7%+22.9%5 years, a year+15.5%+13.2%Largest holdingNVDA 11.2%NVDA 12.6%Main sectorTechnology 53%Technology 56%Holdings as ofMay 31, 2026Jun 30, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from September 2019, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

ONEQ$360VUG$337
September 2019May 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (ONEQ: May 2026, VUG: June 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.