QLDvsQQQM

ProShares Ultra QQQ ETF or Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 61% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 97 stocks in both. Over the last twelve months QLD returned +88.2% and QQQM +42.9%.

61%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
QLD61% in stocks the other holds too
QQQM98% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

QLDQQQMYearly costn/a0.15%Net assets$14.5B$97.2BPositions127105Last 12 months+88.2%+42.9%3 years, a year+51.2%+29.4%5 years, a year+25.6%+18.0%Largest holdingN/A 24.1%NVDA 8.1%Main sectorTechnology 36%Technology 57%Holdings as ofMay 31, 2026May 31, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from October 2020, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

QLD$433QQQM$260
October 2020May 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (QLD: May 2026, QQQM: May 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.