IWFvsVTV

iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF or Vanguard Value ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 13% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 76 stocks in both. VTV costs 0.03% a year against 0.18% for IWF, $15 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months IWF returned +17.5% and VTV +25.9%.

13%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
IWF14% in stocks the other holds too
VTV33% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

IWFVTVYearly cost0.18%0.03%Net assets$128.9B$254.5BPositions371326Last 12 months+17.5%+25.9%3 years, a year+22.4%+18.0%5 years, a year+13.5%+12.3%Largest holdingNVDA 13.8%MU 4.9%Main sectorTechnology 54%Financial Services 22%Holdings as ofJun 30, 2026Jun 30, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from July 2019, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

IWF$330VTV$234
July 2019June 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (IWF: June 2026, VTV: June 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.