IWFvsIWY

iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF or iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 89% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 99 stocks in both. IWF costs 0.18% a year against 0.20% for IWY, $2 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months IWF returned +17.5% and IWY +18.4%.

89%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
IWF89% in stocks the other holds too
IWY99% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

IWFIWYYearly cost0.18%0.20%Net assets$128.9B$17.0BPositions371104Last 12 months+17.5%+18.4%3 years, a year+22.4%+23.0%5 years, a year+13.5%+14.8%Largest holdingNVDA 13.8%NVDA 14.2%Main sectorTechnology 54%Technology 56%Holdings as ofJun 30, 2026Jun 30, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from July 2019, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

IWF$330IWY$355
July 2019June 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (IWF: June 2026, IWY: June 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.