IUSGvsIWF

iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF or iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 75% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 184 stocks in both. IUSG costs 0.04% a year against 0.18% for IWF, $14 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months IUSG returned +25.9% and IWF +17.5%.

75%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
IUSG85% in stocks the other holds too
IWF88% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

IUSGIWFYearly cost0.04%0.18%Net assets$32.2B$128.9BPositions395371Last 12 months+25.9%+17.5%3 years, a year+25.4%+22.4%5 years, a year+14.2%+13.5%Largest holdingNVDA 13.0%NVDA 13.8%Main sectorTechnology 51%Technology 54%Holdings as ofJun 30, 2026Jun 30, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from July 2019, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

IUSG$320IWF$330
July 2019June 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (IUSG: June 2026, IWF: June 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.