IEMGvsIWF

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF or iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. They hold no stocks in common. IEMG costs 0.09% a year against 0.18% for IWF, $9 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months IEMG returned +51.6% and IWF +17.5%.

0.3%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
IEMG0.8% in stocks the other holds too
IWF0.3% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

IEMGIWFYearly cost0.09%0.18%Net assets$162.0B$128.9BPositions2,700371Last 12 months+51.6%+17.5%3 years, a year+24.2%+22.4%5 years, a year+7.8%+13.5%Largest holdingTaiwan 12.5%NVDA 13.8%Main sectorn/aTechnology 54%Holdings as ofMay 31, 2026Jun 30, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from September 2019, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

IEMG$208IWF$334
September 2019May 2026

What they both hold

4 stocks are in both funds: 0.8% of IEMG and 0.3% of IWF. The biggest shared positions:

Stockin IEMGin IWF
NU0.3%0.1%AU0.3%0.1%SCCO0.1%0.0%AUGO0.0%0.0%

Only in IEMG

Its biggest stocks the other fund does not hold.

  1. BAPCredicorp Ltd.0.2%
  2. YUMCYum China Holdings, Inc.0.1%
  3. XPXP Inc.0.0%
  4. JBSJBS0.0%
  5. STNEStoneCo Ltd.0.0%
  6. SMSM Energy Company0.0%

Only in IWF

Its biggest stocks the other fund does not hold.

  1. NVDANVIDIA Corporation13.8%
  2. AAPLApple Inc.6.7%
  3. GOOGLAlphabet Inc.6.2%
  4. AVGOBroadcom5.2%
  5. GOOGAlphabet Inc. (Class C)5.0%
  6. MSFTMicrosoft Corporation4.1%

More comparisons

IWF vs IWYIWF vs VUGIWF vs SPYGIVW vs IWFIUSG vs IWF

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (IEMG: May 2026, IWF: June 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.