VSXYVictorias Secret & Co.
Is the price fair?
Neither cheap nor expensive: modest expectations priced in, but at the top of its own P/E range.
Priced for a decline (~−1% a year). The price demands less than its three-year revenue growth of 4% a year, expectations look modest.
Expensive vs its own history: P/E 18.4 vs a 9.7 median over 21 quarters (+90% vs median).
Against the whole market›
Percentile against every name Ryufin tracks. Higher is better; the tick marks the middle of the market. Context, not one of the checks above.
Where this answer is blind. The growth-implied estimate assumes a fixed discount rate; capital-heavy sectors look structurally rich on it.
What VSXY's price assumes
Victorias Secret & Co. trades at 18.4× earnings against 12.8× for the median Apparel Retail name, more expensive than its own group.
Trailing P/E · Apparel Retail median 12.8 · 1.44× the median: the market pays up for this one
- Free cash flow yield
- 8.4%
Free cash flow yield · Apparel Retail median 9.7%
- Growth the price implies
- −1.3%
Growth the price implies · The price pays for −1.3% free cash flow growth a year for a decade; the business has delivered +36% a year over the last three.
Details›
- Consumer Cyclical median P/E321 names
- 17.8
- Apparel Retail median P/E19 names
- 12.8
- Free cash flow, trailing twelve months
- $554M
- Market capitalisation
- $6.60B
- 3-year revenue growth
- +3.8%
- 3-year free cash flow growth
- +36%
| Method | Per share |
|---|---|
| Its own P/E history, lower quartile | $36.47 |
| Its own P/E history, median | $43.51 |
| Its own P/E history, upper quartile | $74.31 |
| 52-week range | $25.56 – $99.92 |
| Today | $82.78 |
Multiples from SEC filings and end-of-day closes; implied growth from a reverse discounted cash flow. Group medians across the names Ryufin tracks.