PHMPulteGroup
Is the price fair?
Neither cheap nor expensive: modest expectations priced in, but at the top of its own P/E range.
Priced for ~3% a year FCF growth. The price bakes in little to no growth.
Expensive vs its own history: P/E 11.4 vs a 8.6 median over 41 quarters (+33% vs median).
Against the whole market›
Percentile against every name Ryufin tracks. Higher is better; the tick marks the middle of the market. Context, not one of the checks above.
Where this answer is blind. The growth-implied estimate assumes a fixed discount rate; capital-heavy sectors look structurally rich on it.
What PHM's price assumes
PulteGroup trades at 11.4× earnings against 12.8× for the median Residential Construction name, cheaper than its own group.
Trailing P/E · Residential Construction median 12.8 · cheaper than the typical name in its group
- Price / sales
- 1.58
Price / sales · as of 2026-Q2
- Free cash flow yield
- 6.3%
Free cash flow yield · Residential Construction median 5.7%
- Growth the price implies
- +2.7%
Growth the price implies · The price pays for +2.7% free cash flow growth a year for a decade; the business has delivered −7.7% a year over the last three.
Details›
- Price / bookas of 2026-Q2
- 1.99
- Consumer Cyclical median P/E321 names
- 17.8
- Residential Construction median P/E17 names
- 12.8
- Free cash flow, trailing twelve months
- $1.51B
- Market capitalisation
- $24.2B
- 3-year free cash flow growth
- −7.7%
| Method | Per share |
|---|---|
| Its own P/E history, lower quartile | $70.43 |
| Its own P/E history, median | $84.61 |
| Its own P/E history, upper quartile | $102.36 |
| 52-week range | $109.88 – $141.96 |
| Today | $112.12 |
Multiples from SEC filings and end-of-day closes; implied growth from a reverse discounted cash flow. Group medians across the names Ryufin tracks.
Residential Construction
The closest names by size in the same industry