MMSMaximus, Inc.

Industrials

$59.38-32% 1Y

$59.38

$52.1052 weeks$97.94

Is it safe?

Good

Strong, no red flags: a safe balance sheet, clean books, and quality strong.

3 good, 3 neutral

SurvivalSafe zone

Financially healthy, low distress risk Altman Z-score, a bankruptcy-risk model from five balance-sheet ratios.

Honest booksLow risk

Reported earnings show no manipulation flags Beneish M-score, a forensic model that detects earnings-manipulation patterns (receivables outrunning sales, margins slipping, accrual-heavy profit).

Quality8 / 9

High fundamental quality Piotroski F-score, nine pass/fail tests of year-over-year financial health across profitability, balance sheet and efficiency. 7 to 9 is strong, 0 to 3 weak.

Insider conviction-$174K

Insiders were net sellers (-$174K, 90 days to Oct 8, 2026), selling is often routine.

Credit gradeAderived · Jun 30, 2026

Investment-grade balance sheet. A rule of thumb on leverage, not a credit rating.

Drawdown risk32% volderived · Oct 9, 2026

Moderate price swings, typical volatility. Worst drawdown -47% · now 39% below its 52-week high.

Unless marked, from SEC EDGAR, as of Sep 30, 2025.

Against the whole market›

Percentile against every name Ryufin tracks. Higher is better; the tick marks the middle of the market. Context, not one of the checks above.

Volatilitybetter than 69% of the market

Max drawdownbetter than 82% of the market

Where this answer is blind. Altman sits structurally low for utilities and pipelines; Beneish runs high for fast growers, since sales growth alone lifts it; banks and REITs are excluded.

Can MMS take a bad year?

Maximus, Inc. carries $1.58B of net debt at 2.51× EBITDA: a load its earnings can carry.

$1.58B

Net debt · as at Q3 2026 · between two and four years of EBITDA, normal for a stable business

Net debt / EBITDA: 2.51×
Net debt / EBITDA
Altman Z-score: 3.00
Altman Z-score · safe zone, above 3
Interest cover: 6.49×
Interest cover · operating profit covers the interest bill several times over