FRTFederal Realty Investment Trust
Is it safe?
Nothing alarming, nothing pristine: insiders quiet, comfortable debt (A), and steady price behavior.
Insiders were net sellers (-$163K, 90 days to Oct 8, 2026), selling is often routine.
Investment-grade balance sheet. A rule of thumb on leverage, not a credit rating.
Relatively steady, low volatility. Worst drawdown -56% · now 16% below its 52-week high.
Against the whole market›
Percentile against every name Ryufin tracks. Higher is better; the tick marks the middle of the market. Context, not one of the checks above.
Where this answer is blind. Altman sits structurally low for utilities and pipelines; Beneish runs high for fast growers, since sales growth alone lifts it; banks and REITs are excluded.
Can FRT take a bad year?
Federal Realty Investment Trust carries $2.85B of net debt at 2.63× EBITDA: a load its earnings can carry.
Net debt · as at Q1 2026 · between two and four years of EBITDA, normal for a stable business
- Net debt / EBITDA
- 2.63×
Net debt / EBITDA · 3.93× a year ago · the load is coming down
- Cash runway
- 2.2 years
Cash runway · burning $13M a quarter at the current rate
- Annualised volatility
- 20%
Annualised volatility · about as steady as the market itself
Details›
- Total debtQ1 2026
- $2.97B
- Cash and short-term investments
- $116M
- Net debt
- $2.85B
- EBITDA, trailing twelve months
- $1.08B
- Operating profit, trailing twelve months
- $703M
- Debt / equity
- 0.90×
- Total debt / EBITDA
- 2.74×
- Annualised volatilitytwo years of daily moves
- 20%
- Worst drawdown on file
- −56%
- Below its 52-week high
- 16%
Balance sheet from SEC filings; drawdown and volatility from end-of-day closes; Altman Z from the filed statements.
Real Estate
The closest names by size in the same sector