FLNCFluence Energy, Inc.
Is it safe?
Mixed picture: insiders buying, but quality weak and big price swings.
Some accounting flags, worth a closer look Beneish M-score, a forensic model that detects earnings-manipulation patterns (receivables outrunning sales, margins slipping, accrual-heavy profit).
Weak, deteriorating fundamentals Piotroski F-score, nine pass/fail tests of year-over-year financial health across profitability, balance sheet and efficiency. 7 to 9 is strong, 0 to 3 weak.
Insiders were net buyers (+$125K, 90 days to Oct 8, 2026). SEC Form 4 filings: officers and directors must report their own trades within two business days.
Large price swings, high volatility. Worst drawdown -90% · now 77% below its 52-week high.
Unless marked, from SEC EDGAR, as of Sep 30, 2025.
Against the whole market›
Percentile against every name Ryufin tracks. Higher is better; the tick marks the middle of the market. Context, not one of the checks above.
Where this answer is blind. Altman sits structurally low for utilities and pipelines; Beneish runs high for fast growers, since sales growth alone lifts it; banks and REITs are excluded.
Can FLNC take a bad year?
The deepest fall in FLNC's price history on file is −90%; it is 77% below its high today.
Worst drawdown on file · −77% today
- Cash runway
- 3.0 years
Cash runway · burning $29M a quarter at the current rate
- Annualised volatility
- 117%
Annualised volatility · three times the market's own swing
Details›
- Cash and short-term investments
- $339M
- Annualised volatilitytwo years of daily moves
- 117%
- Worst drawdown on file
- −90%
- Below its 52-week high
- 77%
Balance sheet from SEC filings; drawdown and volatility from end-of-day closes; Altman Z from the filed statements.