ENSEnerSys
Is it safe?
Solid, nothing alarming. No accounting flags, quality moderate.
Reported earnings show no manipulation flags Beneish M-score, a forensic model that detects earnings-manipulation patterns (receivables outrunning sales, margins slipping, accrual-heavy profit).
Mixed fundamental signals Piotroski F-score, nine pass/fail tests of year-over-year financial health across profitability, balance sheet and efficiency. 7 to 9 is strong, 0 to 3 weak.
Investment-grade balance sheet. A rule of thumb on leverage, not a credit rating.
Moderate price swings, typical volatility. Worst drawdown -56% · now 26% below its 52-week high.
Unless marked, from SEC EDGAR, as of Mar 31, 2026.
Against the whole market›
Percentile against every name Ryufin tracks. Higher is better; the tick marks the middle of the market. Context, not one of the checks above.
Where this answer is blind. Altman sits structurally low for utilities and pipelines; Beneish runs high for fast growers, since sales growth alone lifts it; banks and REITs are excluded.
Can ENS take a bad year?
EnerSys carries $508M of net debt at 0.85× EBITDA: a load its earnings can carry.
Net debt · as at Q1 2027 · under two and a half years of EBITDA, comfortable
- Net debt / EBITDA
- 0.85×
Net debt / EBITDA · 1.77× a year ago · the load is coming down
- Debt / equity
- 0.53×
Debt / equity
- Annualised volatility
- 38%
Annualised volatility · roughly twice as jumpy as the market
Details›
- Total debtQ1 2027
- $1.04B
- Cash and short-term investments
- $531M
- Net debt
- $508M
- EBITDA, trailing twelve months
- $600M
- Operating profit, trailing twelve months
- $491M
- Debt / equity
- 0.53×
- Total debt / EBITDA
- 1.73×
- Annualised volatilitytwo years of daily moves
- 38%
- Worst drawdown on file
- −56%
- Below its 52-week high
- 26%
Balance sheet from SEC filings; drawdown and volatility from end-of-day closes; Altman Z from the filed statements.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Ranks #2 of 19 by RyuScore