CTSCTS Corporation
Is it safe?
Strong, no red flags: a safe balance sheet, clean books, and quality strong.
Financially healthy, low distress risk Altman Z-score, a bankruptcy-risk model from five balance-sheet ratios.
Reported earnings show no manipulation flags Beneish M-score, a forensic model that detects earnings-manipulation patterns (receivables outrunning sales, margins slipping, accrual-heavy profit).
High fundamental quality Piotroski F-score, nine pass/fail tests of year-over-year financial health across profitability, balance sheet and efficiency. 7 to 9 is strong, 0 to 3 weak.
Moderate price swings, typical volatility. Worst drawdown -53% · now 16% below its 52-week high.
Unless marked, from SEC EDGAR, as of Dec 31, 2025.
Against the whole market›
Percentile against every name Ryufin tracks. Higher is better; the tick marks the middle of the market. Context, not one of the checks above.
Where this answer is blind. Altman sits structurally low for utilities and pipelines; Beneish runs high for fast growers, since sales growth alone lifts it; banks and REITs are excluded.
Can CTS take a bad year?
The deepest fall in CTS's price history on file is −53%; it is 16% below its high today.
Altman Z-score · distress below 1.8 · safe above 3 · safe zone, the balance sheet is not what threatens this one
- Interest cover
- 22.9×
Interest cover · operating profit covers the interest bill several times over
- Annualised volatility
- 35%
Annualised volatility · about as steady as the market itself
- Worst drawdown on file
- −53%
Worst drawdown on file · −16% today
Details›
- Cash and short-term investments
- $91M
- EBITDA, trailing twelve months
- $115M
- Operating profit, trailing twelve months
- $88M
- Annualised volatilitytwo years of daily moves
- 35%
- Worst drawdown on file
- −53%
- Below its 52-week high
- 16%
Balance sheet from SEC filings; drawdown and volatility from end-of-day closes; Altman Z from the filed statements.
Electronic Components
Ranks #4 of 25 by RyuScore