APOApollo Global Management
Is the price fair?
At the top of its own P/E range. That is the only one of 3 checks this filer's data supports, so take it as a single data point rather than a settled answer.
Expensive vs its own history: P/E 43.5 vs a 20.7 median over 14 quarters (+110% vs median).
Against the whole market›
Percentile against every name Ryufin tracks. Higher is better; the tick marks the middle of the market. Context, not one of the checks above.
Where this answer is blind. The growth-implied estimate assumes a fixed discount rate; capital-heavy sectors look structurally rich on it.
What APO's price assumes
Apollo Global Management trades at 43.5× earnings against 18.5× for the median Asset Management name, more expensive than its own group.
Trailing P/E · Asset Management median 18.5 · 2.35× the median: the market pays up for this one
- Price / sales
- 2.08
Price / sales · as of 2026-Q2
- Price / book
- 3.56
Price / book · as of 2026-Q2
- EV / sales
- 1.67
EV / sales
Details›
- Price / bookas of 2026-Q2
- 3.56
- EV / salesas of 2026-Q2
- 1.67
- Financial Services median P/E625 names
- 12.1
- Asset Management median P/E74 names
- 18.5
- Market capitalisation
- $79.3B
| Method | Per share |
|---|---|
| What its own history would imply | not meaningful, 43.5× today against a 20.7× median |
| 52-week range | $99.88 – $151.44 |
| Today | $118.62 |
Multiples from SEC filings and end-of-day closes; implied growth from a reverse discounted cash flow. Group medians across the names Ryufin tracks.
Asset Management
The closest names by size in the same industry