RWLvsXLY

Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF or State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 12% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 47 stocks in both. XLY costs 0.08% a year against 0.39% for RWL, $31 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months RWL returned +28.1% and XLY +8.8%.

12%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
RWL12% in stocks the other holds too
XLY100% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

RWLXLYYearly cost0.39%0.08%Net assets$9.1B$22.6BPositions50451Last 12 months+28.1%+8.8%3 years, a year+21.1%+12.3%5 years, a year+13.2%+6.5%Largest holdingAMZN 4.5%AMZN 22.2%Main sectorHealthcare 19%Consumer Cyclical 100%Holdings as ofMay 31, 2026Jun 30, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from September 2019, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

RWL$271XLY$214
September 2019May 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (RWL: May 2026, XLY: June 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.