PRFvsRWL

Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF or Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 65% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 478 stocks in both. PRF costs 0.34% a year against 0.39% for RWL, $5 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months PRF returned +30.4% and RWL +28.1%.

65%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
PRF88% in stocks the other holds too
RWL97% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

PRFRWLYearly cost0.34%0.39%Net assets$9.8B$9.1BPositions1,003504Last 12 months+30.4%+28.1%3 years, a year+19.3%+21.1%5 years, a year+13.3%+13.2%Largest holdingAAPL 4.3%AMZN 4.5%Main sectorTechnology 20%Healthcare 19%Holdings as ofJul 31, 2026May 31, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from September 2019, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

PRF$268RWL$271
September 2019May 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (PRF: July 2026, RWL: May 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.