RWLvsXLV

Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF or State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 17% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 58 stocks in both. XLV costs 0.08% a year against 0.39% for RWL, $31 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months RWL returned +28.1% and XLV +19.8%.

17%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
RWL19% in stocks the other holds too
XLV99% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

RWLXLVYearly cost0.39%0.08%Net assets$9.1B$40.6BPositions50465Last 12 months+28.1%+19.8%3 years, a year+21.1%+7.9%5 years, a year+13.2%+6.4%Largest holdingAMZN 4.5%LLY 16.5%Main sectorHealthcare 19%Healthcare 100%Holdings as ofMay 31, 2026Jun 30, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from September 2019, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

RWL$271XLV$185
September 2019May 2026

Only in XLV

Its biggest stocks the other fund does not hold.

  1. VEEVVeeva Systems0.5%

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (RWL: May 2026, XLV: June 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.