QQQMvsVTV

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF or Vanguard Value ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 19% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 39 stocks in both. VTV costs 0.03% a year against 0.15% for QQQM, $12 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months QQQM returned +42.9% and VTV +25.9%.

19%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
QQQM27% in stocks the other holds too
VTV19% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

QQQMVTVYearly cost0.15%0.03%Net assets$97.2B$254.5BPositions105326Last 12 months+42.9%+25.9%3 years, a year+29.4%+18.0%5 years, a year+18.0%+12.3%Largest holdingNVDA 8.1%MU 4.9%Main sectorTechnology 57%Financial Services 22%Holdings as ofMay 31, 2026Jun 30, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from October 2020, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

QQQM$260VTV$231
October 2020May 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (QQQM: May 2026, VTV: June 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.