QQQMvsVB

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF or Vanguard Small-Cap ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. They hold no stocks in common. VB costs 0.03% a year against 0.15% for QQQM, $12 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months QQQM returned +42.9% and VB +29.5%.

0.2%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
QQQM0.2% in stocks the other holds too
VB0.2% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

QQQMVBYearly cost0.15%0.03%Net assets$97.2B$188.7BPositions1051,317Last 12 months+42.9%+29.5%3 years, a year+29.4%+16.7%5 years, a year+18.0%+7.7%Largest holdingNVDA 8.1%Vanguard 1.7%Main sectorTechnology 57%Industrials 20%Holdings as ofMay 31, 2026Jun 30, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from October 2020, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

QQQM$260VB$207
October 2020May 2026

What they both hold

2 stocks are in both funds: 0.2% of QQQM and 0.2% of VB. The biggest shared positions:

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (QQQM: May 2026, VB: June 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.