QLDvsVV

ProShares Ultra QQQ ETF or Vanguard Large-Cap ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 46% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 90 stocks in both. Over the last twelve months QLD returned +88.2% and VV +21.9%.

46%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
QLD60% in stocks the other holds too
VV55% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

QLDVVYearly costn/a0.03%Net assets$14.5B$73.8BPositions127452Last 12 months+88.2%+21.9%3 years, a year+51.2%+20.8%5 years, a year+25.6%+12.9%Largest holdingN/A 24.1%NVDA 7.3%Main sectorTechnology 36%Technology 38%Holdings as ofMay 31, 2026Jun 30, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from September 2019, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

QLD$833VV$286
September 2019May 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (QLD: May 2026, VV: June 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.