MOATvsQQQI

VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF or NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 16% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 16 stocks in both. MOAT costs 0.46% a year against 0.68% for QQQI, $22 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months MOAT returned +12.3% and QQQI +26.0%.

16%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
MOAT32% in stocks the other holds too
QQQI28% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

MOATQQQIYearly cost0.46%0.68%Net assets$11.6B$13.1BPositions56105Last 12 months+12.3%+26.0%3 years, a year+10.5%n/a5 years, a year+8.3%n/aLargest holdingMAS 3.0%NVDA 7.7%Main sectorTechnology 28%Technology 59%Holdings as ofJun 30, 2026Jun 30, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from January 2024, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

MOAT$126QQQI$161
January 2024June 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (MOAT: June 2026, QQQI: June 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.