IWFvsVT

iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF or Vanguard Total World Stock ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 34% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 354 stocks in both. VT costs 0.06% a year against 0.18% for IWF, $12 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months IWF returned +17.5% and VT +22.3%.

34%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
IWF99% in stocks the other holds too
VT39% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

IWFVTYearly cost0.18%0.06%Net assets$128.9B$97.9BPositions37110,100Last 12 months+17.5%+22.3%3 years, a year+22.4%+18.0%5 years, a year+13.5%+10.6%Largest holdingNVDA 13.8%NVDA 4.1%Main sectorTechnology 54%Technology 22%Holdings as ofJun 30, 2026Jul 31, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from August 2019, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

IWF$323VT$240
August 2019June 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (IWF: June 2026, VT: July 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.