IWFvsQQQM

iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF or Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 59% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 58 stocks in both. QQQM costs 0.15% a year against 0.18% for IWF, $3 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months IWF returned +17.5% and QQQM +42.9%.

59%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
IWF72% in stocks the other holds too
QQQM81% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

IWFQQQMYearly cost0.18%0.15%Net assets$128.9B$97.2BPositions371105Last 12 months+17.5%+42.9%3 years, a year+22.4%+29.4%5 years, a year+13.5%+18.0%Largest holdingNVDA 13.8%NVDA 8.1%Main sectorTechnology 54%Technology 57%Holdings as ofJun 30, 2026May 31, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from October 2020, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

IWF$244QQQM$260
October 2020May 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (IWF: June 2026, QQQM: May 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.