IEFAvsQQQM

iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF or Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. They hold no stocks in common. IEFA costs 0.07% a year against 0.15% for QQQM, $8 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months IEFA returned +24.8% and QQQM +42.9%.

0.2%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
IEFA0.2% in stocks the other holds too
QQQM0.4% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

IEFAQQQMYearly cost0.07%0.15%Net assets$190.1B$97.2BPositions2,632105Last 12 months+24.8%+42.9%3 years, a year+16.1%+29.4%5 years, a year+8.9%+18.0%Largest holdingASML 2.5%NVDA 8.1%Main sectorn/aTechnology 57%Holdings as ofJul 31, 2026May 31, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from October 2020, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

IEFA$193QQQM$260
October 2020May 2026

What they both hold

2 stocks are in both funds: 0.2% of IEFA and 0.4% of QQQM. The biggest shared positions:

Stockin IEFAin QQQM
FER0.1%0.2%CCEP0.1%0.2%

Only in IEFA

Its biggest stocks the other fund does not hold.

  1. AZNAstraZeneca PLC1.0%
  2. SHELShell plc1.0%
  3. BHPBHP Group Limited0.8%
  4. TTETotalEnergies SE0.7%
  5. UBSUBS Group AG0.7%
  6. BBVABanco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A.0.6%

Only in QQQM

Its biggest stocks the other fund does not hold.

  1. NVDANVIDIA Corporation8.1%
  2. AAPLApple Inc.7.3%
  3. MSFTMicrosoft Corporation5.3%
  4. MUMicron Technology4.8%
  5. AMZNAmazon4.6%
  6. AMDAdvanced Micro Devices3.7%

More comparisons

QQQM vs QYLDQQQI vs QQQMQQQ vs QQQMONEQ vs QQQMJEPQ vs QQQM

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (IEFA: July 2026, QQQM: May 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.