FNDXvsIWB

Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF or iShares Russell 1000 ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 63% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 629 stocks in both. IWB costs 0.15% a year against 0.25% for FNDX, $10 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months FNDX returned +33.0% and IWB +21.9%.

63%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
FNDX96% in stocks the other holds too
IWB92% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

FNDXIWBYearly cost0.25%0.15%Net assets$25.5B$48.3BPositions7361,028Last 12 months+33.0%+21.9%3 years, a year+21.9%+20.3%5 years, a year+13.1%+12.5%Largest holdingAAPL 4.6%NVDA 6.7%Main sectorTechnology 22%Technology 36%Holdings as ofMay 31, 2026Jun 30, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from September 2019, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

FNDX$278IWB$279
September 2019May 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (FNDX: May 2026, IWB: June 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.