ITOTvsIWB

iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF or iShares Russell 1000 ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 94% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 961 stocks in both. ITOT costs 0.03% a year against 0.15% for IWB, $12 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months ITOT returned +23.1% and IWB +21.9%.

94%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
ITOT94% in stocks the other holds too
IWB99% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

ITOTIWBYearly cost0.03%0.15%Net assets$94.1B$48.3BPositions2,5031,028Last 12 months+23.1%+21.9%3 years, a year+20.4%+20.3%5 years, a year+12.2%+12.5%Largest holdingNVDA 6.6%NVDA 6.7%Main sectorTechnology 36%Technology 36%Holdings as ofJun 30, 2026Jun 30, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from July 2019, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

ITOT$273IWB$277
July 2019June 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (ITOT: June 2026, IWB: June 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.