FNDXvsVONV

Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF or Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 65% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 573 stocks in both. VONV costs 0.06% a year against 0.25% for FNDX, $19 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months FNDX returned +33.0% and VONV +28.5%.

65%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
FNDX82% in stocks the other holds too
VONV92% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

FNDXVONVYearly cost0.25%0.06%Net assets$25.5B$21.5BPositions736886Last 12 months+33.0%+28.5%3 years, a year+21.9%+19.4%5 years, a year+13.1%+10.3%Largest holdingAAPL 4.6%MU 3.2%Main sectorTechnology 22%Financial Services 18%Holdings as ofMay 31, 2026May 31, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from September 2019, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

FNDX$278VONV$221
September 2019May 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (FNDX: May 2026, VONV: May 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.