COWZvsRWL

Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF or Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 17% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 88 stocks in both. RWL costs 0.39% a year against 0.49% for COWZ, $10 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months COWZ returned +22.7% and RWL +28.1%.

17%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
COWZ94% in stocks the other holds too
RWL17% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

COWZRWLYearly cost0.49%0.39%Net assets$18.7B$9.1BPositions102504Last 12 months+22.7%+28.1%3 years, a year+11.5%+21.1%5 years, a year+11.0%+13.2%Largest holdingBKNG 2.2%AMZN 4.5%Main sectorHealthcare 20%Healthcare 19%Holdings as ofJul 31, 2026May 31, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from September 2019, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

COWZ$272RWL$271
September 2019May 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (COWZ: July 2026, RWL: May 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.