CGGOvsIWF

Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF or iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 25% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 34 stocks in both. IWF costs 0.18% a year against 0.47% for CGGO, $29 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months CGGO returned +38.0% and IWF +17.5%.

25%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
CGGO39% in stocks the other holds too
IWF56% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

CGGOIWFYearly cost0.47%0.18%Net assets$11.3B$128.9BPositions108371Last 12 months+38.0%+17.5%3 years, a year+22.5%+22.4%5 years, a yearn/a+13.5%Largest holdingTSM 6.6%NVDA 13.8%Main sectorTechnology 29%Technology 54%Holdings as ofMay 31, 2026Jun 30, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from February 2022, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

CGGO$176IWF$188
February 2022May 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (CGGO: May 2026, IWF: June 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.