CGGOvsQQQI

Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF or NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 26% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 23 stocks in both. CGGO costs 0.47% a year against 0.68% for QQQI, $21 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months CGGO returned +38.0% and QQQI +26.0%.

26%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
CGGO31% in stocks the other holds too
QQQI50% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

CGGOQQQIYearly cost0.47%0.68%Net assets$11.3B$13.1BPositions108105Last 12 months+38.0%+26.0%3 years, a year+22.5%n/a5 years, a yearn/an/aLargest holdingTSM 6.6%NVDA 7.7%Main sectorTechnology 29%Technology 59%Holdings as ofMay 31, 2026Jun 30, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from January 2024, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

CGGO$165QQQI$160
January 2024May 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (CGGO: May 2026, QQQI: June 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.