PG vs PM
Procter & Gamble and Philip Morris International, both Consumer Defensive
Procter & Gamble is the larger company at $354B against $315B. On trailing earnings PG is the cheaper of the two at a P/E of 23.0 against 29.0, a gap that is only a bargain if the two are growing at similar rates. Over the past year PM returned +27% against -0.4% for PG. The RyuScore puts PG ahead, 72 against 62 out of 100.
| Figure | PG | PM |
|---|---|---|
| Last close | $152 | $202 |
| Market cap | $354B | $315B |
| Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better | 23.0 | 29.0 |
| Dividend yield | 2.8% | 2.8% |
| 1-year return | -0.4% | +27% |
| 5-year return | +18% | +148% |
| RyuScoresector-relative, 1–10 | 72/100 | 62/100 |
Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.
Procter & Gamble
Revenue of $21B in Q4 2026, net income $3.0B. Its largest reported line is Fabric Home Care, 36% of the disclosed total.
Philip Morris International
Revenue of $11B in Q2 2026, net income $2.8B. Its largest reported line is International Combustibles, 58% of the disclosed total.
Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or see the correlation.