KVUE vs PG

Kenvue and Procter & Gamble, both Consumer Defensive

Procter & Gamble is the larger company at $350B against $35B. On trailing earnings KVUE is the cheaper of the two at a P/E of 20.3 against 22.9, a gap that is only a bargain if the two are growing at similar rates. Over the past year KVUE returned +1.2% against -1.8% for PG. The RyuScore puts PG ahead, 72 against 54 out of 100.

Kenvue and Procter & Gamble compared on valuation, return and the RyuScore
FigureKVUEPG
Last close$17.67$151
Market cap$35B$350B
Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better20.322.9
Dividend yield4.7%2.8%
1-year return+1.2%-1.8%
5-year returnn/a+17%
RyuScoresector-relative, 1–1054/10072/100

Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.

Kenvue

Revenue of $4.0B in Q2 2026, net income $456M. Its largest reported line is Self Care, 40% of the disclosed total.

Procter & Gamble

Revenue of $21B in Q4 2026, net income $3.0B. Its largest reported line is Fabric Home Care, 36% of the disclosed total.

Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or see the correlation.