CLX vs KVUE

Clorox and Kenvue, both Consumer Defensive

Kenvue is the larger company at $35B against $12B. On trailing earnings CLX is the cheaper of the two at a P/E of 16.9 against 22.1, a gap that is only a bargain if the two are growing at similar rates. Over the past year KVUE returned -6.2% against -13% for CLX. Ryufin's sector-relative Smart Score puts KVUE ahead, 8/10 against 6/10.

Clorox and Kenvuecompared on valuation, return and Ryufin’s Smart Score
FigureCLXKVUE
Last close$104$19.22
Market cap$12B$35B
Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better16.922.1
Dividend yield4.7%4.3%
1-year return-13%-6.2%
5-year return-32%n/a
Ryufin Smart Scoresector-relative, 1–106/108/10

Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.

Clorox

Revenue of $1.7B in Q3 2026, net income $187M. Its largest reported line is Health And Wellness, 38% of the disclosed total.

Kenvue

Revenue of $4.0B in Q2 2026, net income $456M. Its largest reported line is Self Care, 43% of the disclosed total.

Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or read the correlation.