CLX vs KMB

Clorox and Kimberly-Clark, both Consumer Defensive

Kimberly-Clark is the larger company at $34B against $12B. On trailing earnings CLX is the cheaper of the two at a P/E of 16.9 against 18.8, a gap that is only a bargain if the two are growing at similar rates. Over the past year CLX returned -13% against -15% for KMB. Ryufin's sector-relative Smart Score puts KMB ahead, 9/10 against 6/10.

Clorox and Kimberly-Clarkcompared on valuation, return and Ryufin’s Smart Score
FigureCLXKMB
Last close$104$110
Market cap$12B$34B
Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better16.918.8
Dividend yield4.7%4.6%
1-year return-13%-15%
5-year return-32%-1.6%
Ryufin Smart Scoresector-relative, 1–106/109/10

Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.

Clorox

Revenue of $1.7B in Q3 2026, net income $187M. Its largest reported line is Health And Wellness, 38% of the disclosed total.

Kimberly-Clark

Revenue of $4.2B in Q2 2026, net income $345M. Its largest reported line is Babyandchildcareproducts, 41% of the disclosed total.

Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or read the correlation.