COCO vs PRMB

The Vita Coco Company, Inc. and Primo Brands Corporation, both Consumer Defensive

Primo Brands Corporation is the larger company at $8.8B against $4.8B. On trailing earnings COCO is the cheaper of the two at a P/E of 34.7 against 85.1, a gap that is only a bargain if the two are growing at similar rates. Over the past year COCO returned +91% against -2.2% for PRMB. Ryufin's sector-relative Smart Score puts COCO ahead, 8/10 against 2/10.

The Vita Coco Company, Inc. and Primo Brands Corporationcompared on valuation, return and Ryufin’s Smart Score
FigureCOCOPRMB
Last close$62.78$22.98
Market cap$4.8B$8.8B
Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better34.785.1
Dividend yieldn/a1.7%
1-year return+91%-2.2%
5-year returnn/a+58%
Ryufin Smart Scoresector-relative, 1–108/102/10

Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.

The Vita Coco Company, Inc.

Revenue of $216M in Q2 2026, net income $49M. Its largest reported line is Vita Coco Coconut Water, 80% of the disclosed total.

Primo Brands Corporation

Revenue of $1.8B in Q2 2026, net income $69M. Its largest reported line is Regional Spring Water, 49% of the disclosed total.

Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or read the correlation.