QQQMvsVT

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF or Vanguard Total World Stock ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 30% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 96 stocks in both. VT costs 0.06% a year against 0.15% for QQQM, $9 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months QQQM returned +42.9% and VT +22.3%.

30%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
QQQM98% in stocks the other holds too
VT30% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

QQQMVTYearly cost0.15%0.06%Net assets$97.2B$97.9BPositions10510,100Last 12 months+42.9%+22.3%3 years, a year+29.4%+18.0%5 years, a year+18.0%+10.6%Largest holdingNVDA 8.1%NVDA 4.1%Main sectorTechnology 57%Technology 22%Holdings as ofMay 31, 2026Jul 31, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from October 2020, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

QQQM$260VT$219
October 2020May 2026

Only in QQQM

Its biggest stocks the other fund does not hold.

  1. ARMArm Holdings plc0.2%

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (QQQM: May 2026, VT: July 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.