IXNvsSMH

iShares Global Tech ETF or VanEck Semiconductor ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 39% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 20 stocks in both. SMH costs 0.35% a year against 0.39% for IXN, $4 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months IXN returned +58.1% and SMH +136.1%.

39%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
IXN39% in stocks the other holds too
SMH82% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

IXNSMHYearly cost0.39%0.35%Net assets$9.5B$77.2BPositions14226Last 12 months+58.1%+136.1%3 years, a year+33.3%+63.4%5 years, a year+21.5%+38.9%Largest holdingNVDA 13.0%NVDA 17.5%Main sectorTechnology 75%Technology 95%Holdings as ofJun 30, 2026Jun 30, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from July 2019, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

IXN$506SMH$1,254
July 2019June 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (IXN: June 2026, SMH: June 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.