IWYvsSCHG

iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF or Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF, side by side from their own SEC filings. 67% of their stock holdings are the same at the same weight, across 48 stocks in both. SCHG costs 0.04% a year against 0.20% for IWY, $16 a year less on $10,000. Over the last twelve months IWY returned +18.4% and SCHG +27.9%.

67%of the two portfolios is the same stocks at the same weight
IWY76% in stocks the other holds too
SCHG81% in stocks the other holds too
stocks in bothstocks only in that fundbonds, cash and unmatched shares

The two funds

From each fund's latest N-PORT filing and its prospectus.

IWYSCHGYearly cost0.20%0.04%Net assets$17.0B$61.1BPositions104197Last 12 months+18.4%+27.9%3 years, a year+23.0%+26.6%5 years, a year+14.8%+15.9%Largest holdingNVDA 14.2%NVDA 11.0%Main sectorTechnology 56%Technology 47%Holdings as ofJun 30, 2026May 31, 2026

Returns are total returns with dividends reinvested, from the funds’ own monthly figures; “(price)” marks a fund whose filing record is younger than a year, whose twelve months are its price change. The stronger figure in each row is set in bold. Past returns say what happened, not what will.

Growth of $100

Both funds from September 2019, the first month both report, dividends reinvested.

IWY$360SCHG$347
September 2019May 2026

More comparisons

From each fund’s Form N-PORT (IWY: June 2026, SCHG: May 2026) and prospectus, via the SEC’s public data sets. Overlap counts only the stocks we can match to a listing: stock by stock, the smaller of the two weights, added up.